一张普通的停车告票，折腾下来还没完了。今天收到正式的通知，上次听证会的结果，不支持提出的异议，仍维持原来的处罚，而且加上延期、听证会的费用，这张告票从最开始的60刀，涨到125刀，如果一个月内不付，那么就将变成175刀。
这个结果让我很是意外，也很恼火，其实这告票最大的问题就是没有足够的证据，我想到的是在听证会上听到的，如果不接受这个结果，可以去法院提出起诉，让法庭来判决，于是我考虑写封信给市政厅，询问具体的步骤。
收到信已经是下午了，感觉很困也很累，想着很难专注去写信，于是干脆去眯一下。人心里有事确实影响睡眠，躺那满脑子都是这件事情，很快我理清了头绪，打官司应该是下一步要做的，首先应该申请在市政部门重审，这样是最简单省事省钱的，那么重审需要的理由是什么了？正如之前我提到的，那个主持人明显的种族歧视就是把柄，想清楚这个逻辑之后，信也就好写了。我爬起来先查了下温哥华市政府那些部门可以接受这方面的投诉，再把前后的理由、投诉、要求想清楚，最后写了封要求重新要求听证的信，附在最后大家有兴趣可以瞄一下。
这么样的瞎折腾也不知道结果如何，只是感觉确实很离谱，不搞一下很不爽。
信件的中文翻译：
**主题：因种族歧视和裁决不公正而要求重新审理**
姓名：
执照
通知编号：GK
尊敬的法规官员，
我写信正式要求重新审理我的停车罚单裁决，因为我认为 2024 年 9 月举行的听证会受到了种族歧视和裁决者的不公正裁决的影响。
在听证会上，当我被叫去出示证据时，裁决者要求我提供姓名，我清楚地提供了姓名，包括对我姓氏的具体说明。尽管如此，裁决者还是以不友好的方式再次询问我的名字和姓氏。我的名字在所有提交的文件上都以标准格式书写，名字后面跟着姓氏——这个名字并不特别复杂。随后，我提出用我的英文名 Jason 来方便沟通，这时裁判员提出了一个非常不恰当且令人反感的问题：“你为什么有两个名字？”这个问题与诉讼无关，而且令人深感不安，对裁判员的公正性和专业性产生了严重怀疑。
此外，在听证会上，我指出了罚单的一个重大问题：证据不足。现场警官拍摄的照片中没有一张显示我的车牌与任何停车限制标志的关系。尽管存在明显的证据差距，但裁判员未经适当考虑就驳回了我的论点。这些事件的结合给我留下了强烈的印象，即种族偏见影响了裁判员做出公正判决的能力。
我认为裁判员的行为严重违反了此类诉讼所应具有的公平性，可能表明存在种族歧视。因此，我强烈敦促您取消原裁决并准予重新听证。
如果此请求未得到适当处理，我将上报此事。我打算向温哥华市的**公平办公室**提出正式投诉，如有必要，还将向处理公共实体提供的服务中的歧视案件的**不列颠哥伦比亚省人权法庭 (BCHRT)**提出投诉。我还将考虑联系**不列颠哥伦比亚省监察员**，调查该程序的公平性，并向**温哥华市投诉办公室**提交报告。
我希望此事能迅速得到妥善解决，并期待您的回复。
诚挚地，
以下是原文
**Subject: Request for Rehearing Due to Racial Discrimination and Unfair Decision at Adjudication**
Name:
Licence
Notice Number:GK
Dear Bylaw Officer,
I am writing to formally request a rehearing of my parking ticket adjudication, as I believe the hearing held on September , 2024, was tainted by racial discrimination and an unjust decision by the adjudicator.
During the hearing, when I was called to present my evidence, the adjudicator asked for my name, which I provided clearly, including a specific clarification of my surname. Despite this, the adjudicator proceeded to ask again, in an unfriendly manner, which part was my first name and which part was my last name. My name was written in the standard format on all submitted documents, with the first name followed by the last name— —a name that is not particularly complex. I then offered to use my English name, Jason, to ease communication, at which point the adjudicator asked a highly inappropriate and offensive question: “Why do you have two names?” This question was irrelevant to the proceedings and deeply troubling, casting serious doubt on the adjudicator’s impartiality and professionalism.
Furthermore, during the hearing, I pointed out a significant issue with the ticket: insufficient evidence. None of the photos taken by the officer at the scene showed my vehicle's license plate in relation to any parking restriction signs. Despite this glaring evidentiary gap, the adjudicator dismissed my argument without proper consideration. The combination of these events has left me with a strong impression that racial bias influenced the adjudicator’s ability to make a fair judgment.
I believe that the adjudicator’s actions reflect a serious breach of the fairness expected in such proceedings and may be indicative of racial discrimination. As a result, I strongly urge you to cancel the original adjudication decision and grant a new hearing.
Should this request not be appropriately addressed, I will escalate the matter. I intend to file a formal complaint with the City of Vancouver’s **Equity Office** and, if necessary, with the **British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal (BCHRT)**, which handles cases of discrimination in services provided by public entities. I will also consider contacting the **Ombudsperson of BC** to investigate the fairness of the process, as well as file a report with the **City of Vancouver's Complaint Office**.
I hope for a prompt and appropriate resolution to this matter and look forward to your response.
Sincerely,
蹲個後續！